I recently read an article entitled
“Religious Conflict in Burma” by Karen Kirk about rape in Burma and asked
questions and provided answers to those same questions. Questions like “what
does “rape” mean?” “Is it a crime?” “Is
it legal?” The legal definition says rape is a weapon of psychological warfare,
recognized under the Geneva Convention s a war crime and a crime against humanity. On an inter-personal
level, rape is an act of control. On a societal level violence against women
could have the similar consequences. In this article Karen talked about the
problems that occurred in Burma along with a few videos from women in the
country. Burma endured violent military regime, censorship, ethic tension, and
religious conflict that affected the minority populations and women.
In the videos each time a rape
occurred the country was divided between people, gender, military, and ordinary
citizens. The armed forces used rape to demean women, intimidate communities
and fracture the country along ethic lines. There were always personal stories
of both victims that were raped and people that know someone that were raped. If they change the perception
of their women, Burma could minimize the inequalities between genders and heal
the divisions between populations. I believe if citizens’ rights were protected
thing like this would not be a factor. Rape is not a game and it should not be
something that is done to demean someone because of race, sex, or religion.
Using rape as a means of control and separating race, sex, and gender. Is a complete infringement of human rights. Religion has always been something people use against others to violate their equal rights. With more articles as such and more television exsposure on these human rights violations we can come closer to a better society.
ReplyDelete